Dante vs. AES67 | Hoang Bao Khoa

08/11/2025    5    4.6/5 in 2 votes 
Dante vs. AES67 | Hoang Bao Khoa
Explore the differences between Dante and AES67 - two widely used Audio-over-IP protocols. This article explains how each protocol works, their compatibility, advantages, and practical applications in professional audio systems, helping you choose the right solution for your setup.

What is Dante?

Dante is an Audio-over-IP protocol developed by Audinate, designed to transmit a large number of audio channels over a network with low latency. Dante has also expanded into video with Dante AV, enabling high-quality audio and video data transport over IP networks.

Management with Dante Controller

Dante uses the Dante Controller software to manage devices on the network. Its user-friendly interface allows monitoring devices, routing channels as easily as a virtual patch bay, and supports plug-and-play integration with compatible devices.

Difference between Dante & AES67 | Hoàng Bảo Khoa

Compatibility

Many Dante-compatible devices are available on the market — from expansion cards for existing equipment to products with Dante integrated from the factory — making system deployment and expansion straightforward.

Difference between Dante & AES67 | Hoàng Bảo Khoa

What is AES67?

AES67 is an open standard for Audio-over-IP developed by the Audio Engineering Society (AES). Its goal is to enable high-quality, low-latency audio transport while ensuring openness and interoperability between different systems.

Management in AES67

Unlike Dante, AES67 does not provide a standard centralized management tool because it is an open protocol. Creating and managing audio streams is typically done through the interface of each device or the GUI provided by the respective manufacturer.

Compatibility

Due to its open nature, AES67 is designed to bridge different Audio-over-IP protocols. It allows devices from multiple protocols (e.g., Dante, Ravenna, Livewire) to exchange data when needed, making it suitable for recording studios, broadcast environments, or multi-platform integration.

  • For example, a Dante network can connect to a Ravenna network using AES67 as a bridging layer, enabling data transfer between the two systems.
  • This makes AES67 a strong choice for recording studios and broadcast setups where multiple platforms need to interconnect.

Conclusion

Both Dante and AES67 are powerful Audio-over-IP solutions but serve slightly different purposes:

  • Dante: Known for its user-friendly management, multi-channel routing, and low latency — ideal for live performances and stage applications.
  • AES67: An open standard optimized for interoperability across multiple protocols, suitable for recording, broadcast, or systems requiring multi-platform connectivity.

Choosing between the two protocols depends on project requirements — channel count, management needs, interoperability with other systems, and the intended final use.

CERTIFICATE